Sep 06 2008
Maddow and Rieckhoff talk about what McCain didn’t: vets
Two of my favorite people to listen to on the issue of veterans and how McCain didn’t address those issues in his speech Thursday night.
Sep 06 2008
Two of my favorite people to listen to on the issue of veterans and how McCain didn’t address those issues in his speech Thursday night.
Sep 03 2008
And yet they had this woman stand in front of a crowd on Friday and talk about how anti-earmark she is. I wonder if she’s going to talk about that again tonight. Knowing how the GOP generally treats facts, she probably will.
Three times in recent years, McCain’s catalogs of “objectionable” spending have included earmarks for this small Alaska town, requested by its mayor at the time — Sarah Palin.
…
This year, Palin, who has been governor for nearly 22 months, defended earmarking as a vital part of the legislative system. “The federal budget, in its various manifestations, is incredibly important to us, and congressional earmarks are one aspect of this relationship,” she wrote in a newspaper column.
In 2001, McCain’s list of spending that had been approved without the normal budget scrutiny included a $500,000 earmark for a public transportation project in Wasilla. The Arizona senator targeted $1 million in a 2002 spending bill for an emergency communications center in town — one that local law enforcement has said is redundant and creates confusion.
McCain also criticized $450,000 set aside for an agricultural processing facility in Wasilla that was requested during Palin’s tenure as mayor and cleared Congress soon after she left office in 2002. The funding was provided to help direct locally grown produce to schools, prisons and other government institutions, according to Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan watchdog group.
Wasilla received $11.9 million in earmarks from 2000 to 2003. The results of this spending are very apparent today. (The town also benefited from $15 million in federal funds to promote regional rail transportation.)
…
Wasilla had received few if any earmarks before Palin became mayor. She actively sought federal funds — a campaign that began to pay off only after she hired a lobbyist with close ties to Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), who long controlled federal spending as chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee. He made funneling money to Alaska his hallmark.
…
This year she submitted to Congress a list of Alaska projects worth $197.8 million, including $2 million to research crab productivity in the Bering Sea and $7.4 million to improve runway lighting at eight Alaska airports. A spokesman said she cut the original list of 54 projects to 31.
[From McCain had criticized earmarks from Palin -- chicagotribune.com]
Sep 02 2008
I’m a little late to the game in the discussion of Sarah Palin, John McCain’s presumptive Vice Presidential nominee, thanks to a craptastic three day weekend, but I hope you won’t hold it against me. I swear I said some of these things to friends on Friday, before they became commonplace among the media (I have witnesses, really). So here’s what I have to say about the Alaska governor, as well as a choice list of factoids that I think are worth noting about the woman we are so quickly getting to know.
So, I had two major responses to McCain’s unveiling of his VP pick last Friday. The first is one that I believe has only been confirmed over this weekend as the press has dug up more and more dirt. I believe that this was an impulsive choice on McCain’s part. It was a reckless attempt to get the spotlight off of Obama and the Democrats and the spectacularly succesful performance of last week’s convention only made such a decision seem more necessary. Rather than appoint someone unexciting like Mitt Romney or Tim Pawlenty, they decided to pick a woman that no one had ever heard of and given this knee-jerk decision, she was never fully vetted as a candidate. That’s certainly proven to be true as the juicy stories have spilled out this weekend, because let’s face it, if the vetters did have time to fully do their job, they should never work again because they did a really shitty job.
The second response is the one that was apparent to everyone else: McCain picked her to appeal to estranged Hillary supporters. First of all, this is obviously a pre-convention tactic as I’m confident that the Clintons tied up any disappointed voter that they had the ability to move last week. Any other hold-outs aren’t holding out because they loved Hillary, they have their own issues. But as a woman (who, granted, has always been an Obama supporter), I find the idea that putting a pair of ovaries on the presidential ticket as a way to appeal to women voters incredibly insulting. Palin and Clinton are 180 degrees different from each other. Just because they both have two x chromosomes doesn’t make them the same and the idea that all women are is, to me, incredibly indicative of how the Republican party views the fairer sex. Just give us a girl and we’ll be happy, doesn’t matter what she stands for. And that, “my friends,” is bullshit.
Some more buzz on the issue is that McCain actually wanted his buddy Joe Lieberman to be his running mate. However, the right-wing heavyweights weren’t so hot on that idea and pressed him to pick a red-blooded conservative. Isn’t that a real “maverick” thing to do?
So now McCain has landed himself running mate with no foreign policy experience, less than two years as the governor of Alaska. Alaska, by the by, is a state that is ranked 47th in population and 50th in population density and has fewer people in it than most United States congressional districts. She’s currently under ethics investigation for abuse of power. Her previous job execution as mayor of Wasilla, a 6,000 person town, has not been evaluated well. They’re hanging their hat on her reputation as a “reformer” even though she has ties to indicted Alaska senator Ted Stevens and a history of pro-earmark policies. Her teenage daughter is pregnant, while she herself has supported abstinence-only sex education and is a member of Feminists for Life, an organization that does not support birth control. This is just the tip of the iceburg, folks, especially when this is the VP pick for the oldest person ever to run for the office President that has a history of cancer. People in the media are already wondering if McCain will take the opportunity in the next couple of days to pull her nomination. Personally, I can’t wait for the Vice Presidential debate this year.
These are some of the choice tidbits I pulled from the various stories that gathered in my feed reader over the long weekend. Some were touched on above, some are fluffy and just mildly interesting but several are items that I find very significant. Enjoy. Hope I can help you learn something new.
Aug 21 2008
Painting the Democratic candidate (in any election) as the latte-drinking, arugula-eating, out of touch elitist is old hat for the GOP, so it’s no surprise that the McCain has been making those claims against Obama for a long time now. However, as with many issues in this campaign, the candidate has been bringing the hypocrisy of those claims to light quite a bit, especially in the last five days.
First there was his appearance at the Saddleback church this past weekend where he responded to a question about how he defined being rich in this country and his response was that rich begins at $5 million. I remember the good old days when being a millionaire meant you were rich, but apparently John McCain doesn’t think so.
However the real kicker was yesterday when Politico asked him how many houses he owned.
“I think — I’ll have my staff get to you,” McCain told Politico in Las Cruces, N.M. “It’s condominiums where — I’ll have them get to you.”
Seriously? I mean, I know McCain’s been doing a wonderful job of playing the old guy who doesn’t remember anything and has a hard time keeping things straight and thus can use that to avoid any responsibility for changing my positions or not knowing the facts about integral policy issues, but he doesn’t even know how many houses he owns! You’re trying to say that Obama is out of touch and elitist and you can’t even remember that you own 7 houses (that was the figure his campaign staff eventually submitted to the press).
The Obama campaign has been quick to jump on this little gem. The candidate himself mentioned it mere hours after McCain’s response to the question reported and they’ve already generated an ad that highlights the comment.
The McCain campaign has responded thus far by saying that because Obama owns one million dollar “mansion” (complete with a nice reference to Tony Rezko), made $4 million last year (a drop in the bucket compared to Cindy McCain’s fortune) and spent his vacation in Hawaii (because it’s not like that’s where he was raised or where his grandmother lives), that he has no place to talk about houses and elitism. But since the Obama campaign released the above ad after the McCain camp’s comments, their response on this issue seems to be, “Game on.”